The purpose of this plan is to set forth a plan for the City of Hawarden water service area in times of drought or water shortages. The plan will attempt to provide a course of action that will fairly distribute the available water supplies to all users based on an allocation policy. It is understood that before any water uses are restricted, the utilities will attempt to manage the shortage through required conservation.
TABLE I CITY OF HAWARDEN
|
|||||||||
| Well No. |
June 2002 Pumping Rates GPM |
Static and Pumping
|
|||||||
Phase I & II
|
Phase III
|
Phase IV
|
Phase V (1)
|
||||||
| Static | Pump | Static | Pump | Static | Pump | Static | Pump | ||
| 3 | 120 | 15 | 7+ | 10 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
| 4 | 160 | 13+ | 9+ | 10 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| 6 | 120 | 10 | 7+ | 7 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 7 | 200 | 13+ | 6+ | 10 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 1 |
| 8 | 160 | 12+ | 8+ | 10 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
| 9 | 150 | 12+ | 8+ | 10 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
| 10 | 220 | 13+ | 7 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 1 |
| 11 | 180 | 14+ | 8+ | 12 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 1 |
TABLE II Water Pumping Supply Capacities |
|||||||
Capacity Measured |
Gallons Per Min. |
Hours |
Active Well
|
June *
|
July *
|
August *
|
Sept.
|
| Active Well Average Firm(2) Capacity (1) | 1090 GPM | 20 hrs | 1.30 MGD | 1.43 MGD | 1.57 MGD | 1.64 MGD | 1.50 MGD |
| Active Well Peak Firm(2) Capacity | 1310 GPM | 20 hrs | 1.57 MGD | 1.69 MGD | 1.83 MGD | 1.90 MGD | 1.76 MGD |
| Active Well Max. Average Capacity | 1090 GPM | 24 hrs | 1.57 MGD | 1.71 MGD | 1.88 MGD | 1.97 MGD | 1.80 MGD |
| Active Well Max. Peak Capacity | 1310 GPM | 24 hrs | 1.88 MGD | 2.03 MGD | 2.20 MGD | 2.29 MGD | 2.11 MGD |
| Water Clorination Plant Capacity | 1500 GPM | 20 hrs 24 hrs |
1.80 MGD 2.16 MGD |
Average Peak |
|||
(1)Average (Computes Capacity without largest Well)
(2)Firm Capacity (Is based on a 20 hours of Well Capacity).
*Note 1: The last 4 columns depict enhanced capacity based on the use of standby wells. These wells may only be used 30 days per year. We would utilize them on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays to boost capacity and relieve pressure off of the localized aquifers around our plant.
*Note 2: Standby wells will be used on a regular basis during the peak month to protect the active/primary well aquifers from depletion. May is not shown due to the fact that during May and June the aquifer levels are at some of their highest due to the elevated Big Sioux River Levels and and due to localized spring rains/snow melt.
TABLE III STANDBY WELL CAPACITY INCREASE PLAN(4 Day Cycles) |
||||
STANDBY WELLS |
JUNE OPERATION |
JULY OPERATION |
AUGUST OPERATION |
SEPTEMBER OPERATION |
| Well 1 100 gpm |
************** | ************* | ||
| Well 5 120 gpm |
************* | ************* | ||
| Well 2 160 gpm |
************* | ************* | ||
| Gained Capacity | 100 gpm | 220 gpm | 280 gpm | 160 gpm |
The Water Conservation and Drought Contingency Plan listed in the Table IV below shall be implemented as necessary to conserve water and protect our shallow aquifer from prolonged depletion due to drought or to conserve water in the event that a major mechanical plant failure occurs at the plant, major distribution line failure, or water contamination.
TABLE IV HAWARDEN WATER CONSERVATION
|
||
CONDITION |
APPROXIMATE TRIGGER POINT |
CITY RESPONSE OR ACTIVITY |
|
PHASE I - WATER ADVISORY
Approximately three to six months of substantially below normal precipitation and dropping stream flows. |
Static and pumping water levels within 2ft of normal. Mild dry winter; below normal rains in spring; drought in summer.
|
|
|
PHASE II -WATER WATCH
Approximately nine months of substantially below normal precipitation and dropping stream levels |
Static and pumping water levels below normal by 2 ft. up to 5 ft.
|
|
|
PHASE III -WATER WARNING Significant drop in groundwater levels while pumping, or poor recovery of groundwater levels when pumping is stopped.
|
Static and pumping water levels below normal By 5 ft. up to 7 ft.
|
|
|
PHASE V -WATER EMERGENCY
Aquifer levels drop to levels where continued significant pumping would damage the water-bearing formation. Water demand approaches or exceeds the ability of the aquifer to deliver water. |
Static and pumping water levels below normal By 7 ft. or more.
|
|
If water rationing becomes necessary due to a major water catastrophe the Recommended Priority Allocation System from the 1985 State Water Plan shall be utilized. That system is listed below:
Recommended Priority Allocation System